What Is the Purpose of Fashion?

When something has a dual purpose of practicality and artfulness, its meaning becomes blurred, especially when it's an umbrella term such as fashion that can be so common, yet also so elite. Fashion is a combination of clothing and art, of necessity and excess. In theory, clothes should ideally lie in the middle of the fashion spectrum, instead of pieces that fall more towards the clothing and necessity side than the art and excess side, or vice versa. But just because a piece of clothing isn't practical, or even wearable, doesn't mean it shouldn't be fashion. Fulfilling its role as a segment of art, fashion should evoke ideas, feelings, and images visually. The fact that those ideas need to be conveyed on fabric in some way remotely wearable is just part of the art of fashion. Fashion is personal because of its connection to the wearer, and therefore is a form of expression. And like any form of expression, there are the small opinions, and the big statements. 

Sometimes, the statements mean more than the clothes. Sometimes, the purpose of a piece of clothing is not to be worn, but to evoke thought or even action. Sometimes, just sometimes, the purpose of fashion is to share ideas more meaningful than the superficial world that is fashion itself. The fashion industry is constantly building up its commercial empire while simultaneously pining for the return of aura, story, and idea promoting creations. What fashion needs to do is accept that not all clothes are for wearing, or, more importantly, buying.



Lots of Alexander McQueen's work wasn't for wearing, it was for producing an image or idea.


Comme des Garçons.

YSL.

Philip Treacy for Alexander McQueen.

John Galliano for Maison Margiela.




6 comments:

  1. Interesting ideas- what's always stood out to me about Alexander McQueen is that those shows were more about portraying women as powerful characters or representing them as ethereal beings, rather than a consumer market to manipulate so while those clothes are archive pieces and not available for wholesale, it is the houses reputation and ideology that is its legacy, not thousands of pieces

    http://secret-hipster.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed, McQueen said once that he wanted people to be afraid of the women he dressed, which is what he did in a beautifully wild way. No one really bought/wore those clothes, but they were made for the ideas.

      Delete
  2. Yet another great post! Completely agree that fashion can be a means of sharing ideas and an artistic medium rather than just having the practicality of being a garment in which to clothe oneself. Really enjoyed reading this xx

    ReplyDelete
  3. Really great post:) Have a nice day!

    www.bloglovin.com/blogs/printed-sea-3880191

    ReplyDelete